You Wanted Change. You Now Have It! But At What Cost?


‘Twas the Night Before Elections (sent by Bill Hardy)
October 31, 2008, 10:00 am
Filed under: Humor (If one can laugh at such a serious situation)

    *’Twas the night before elections*
    *And all through the town*
    *Tempers were flaring*
    *Emotions all up and down!*
    **
    *I, in my bathrobe*
    *With a cat in my lap*
    *Had cut off the TV*
    *Tired of political crap.*
    **
    *When all of a sudden*
    *There arose such a noise*
    *I peered out of my window*
    *Saw Obama and his boys*
    **
    *They had come for my wallet*
    *They wanted my pay*
    *To give to the others*
    *Who had not worked a day!*
    **
    *He snatched up my money*
    *And quick as a wink*
    *Jumped back on his bandwagon*
    *As I gagged from the stink*
    **
    *He then rallied his henchmen*
    *Who were pulling his cart*
    *I could tell they were out*
    *To tear my country apart!*
    **
    *’ On Fannie, on Freddie, *
    *On Biden and Ayers!*
    *On Acorn, On Pelosi’*
    *He screamed at the pairs!*
    **
    *They took off for his cause*
    *And as he flew out of sight*
    *I heard him laugh at the nation*
    *Who wouldn’t stand up and fight!*
    **
    *So I leave you to think*
    *On this one final note-*
    *IF YOU DONT WANT SOCIALISM*
    *GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!*

Comments Off


Short Truths…
October 30, 2008, 9:46 am
Filed under: US Politics

“Government has created programs that are supposed to help people.  But the powerful liberals in government then creates a bureaucracy to run the program.  The poor beleaguered citizen watches his taxes go up and wonders why all those people who were supposed to be helped are complaining.  The citizen has been shut out from helping them but he’s sure he could do a better job of it than the government, for far less money.  The government and all its bureaucrats has only taken his money to pay people to be poor.  If you pay people to be poor, there are going to be a lot of poor people.”
 
     Ronald Reagan

Bumper sticker seen in Dallas , Texas …

“I’ll keep my freedom, my guns, and my money.  You can keep THE CHANGE.”

    Vote for McCain/Palin

Comments Off


Obama: The Making of a Fuehrer (sent by Dale Alvarez)
October 30, 2008, 9:36 am
Filed under: The Left, Who Is Obama?

I must confess, I was not impressed by Sen. Barack Obama from  the first time I saw him. At first I was excited to see a black candidate. He looked youthful, spoke well, appeared to be confident, a wholesome presidential package.

I was put  off soon, not just because of his shallowness but also  because there was an air of haughtiness in his demeanor that  was unsettling. His posture and his body language were  louder than his empty words. Obama’s speeches are unlike any  political speech we have heard in American history. Never a politician in this land had such a quasi “religious” impact on so many people. The fact that Obama is a  total incognito with zero accomplishment makes this inexplicable infatuation  alarming. Obama is not an ordinary man. He is not a genius. In  fact, he is quite ignorant on most important subjects.  Barack Obama is a narcissist.

Dr. Sam Vaknin, the author of  “Malignant Self Love,” also believes, “Barack Obama appears to be  a narcissist.”

Vaknin  is a world authority on narcissism. He understands it and describes the inner mind of a narcissist like no other person. When he talks about narcissism everyone listens.  Vaknin says that Obama’s language, posture and demeanor, and  the testimonies of his closest, nearest and dearest suggest  that the Senator is either a narcissist or he may have narcissistic personality disorder  (NPD).

Narcissists project a grandiose but false image of themselves. Jim  Jones, the charismatic leader of People’s Temple, the man who led over 900 of his followers to cheerfully commit mass suicide and even murder their own children was also a  narcissist. Charles Manson, Joseph Koni, Shoko Asahara, Joe Stalin, Saddam, Mao Zedong, Kim Jong IL, and Adolph Hitler  are a few examples of narcissists of our time. All these men  had a tremendous influence over their fanciers and  followers. They created a personality cult around themselves, and with their blazing speeches elevated their admirer’s souls, filled their hearts with enthusiasm and instilled in their minds a new zest for life. Those men gave their followers hope! They promised them the moon, but alas, they invariably brought them to their doom. When you are a  victim of a cult of personality, you don’t know it until it  is too late.

One determining factor in the development of NPD is childhood abuse. ” Obama’ s early life was decidedly chaotic and replete with traumatic and mentally bruising dislocations,” says Vaknin. “Mixed-race marriages were even less common then.  His parents went through a divorce when he was an infant (two years old). Obama saw his father only once again, before he died in a car accident. His mother re-married and Obama had to relocate to Indonesia, a foreign land with a radically foreign culture, to be raised by a stepfather.  He was raised as an only child, full of himself and no others. He never had to share the spotlight with any siblings. At the age of ten, he was whisked off to live with his maternal (white) grandparents. He saw his mother only intermittently in the following few years and then she vanished from his life in 1979. She died of cancer in 1995.”

One  must never underestimate the manipulative genius of pathological narcissists.  They project such an imposing personality that it overwhelms those around them.  Charmed by the charisma of the narcissist, people become like clay in his hands. They cheerfully do his bidding and delight to be at his service. The narcissist shapes the world around him and reduces others in his own inverted image. He creates a cult of personality; his admirers become his co-dependents.

Narcissists have no interest in things that do not help them to reach  their personal objectives. They are focused on one thing alone, and that is power. All other issues are meaningless to them and they do not want to waste their precious time on rivialities. Anything that does not help them is beneath them and does not deserve their attention.

If an issue raised in the Senate does not help Obama in one way or another, he has no interest in it. The ”Present” vote is a safe vote; he used the “Present” all the time as a member of the Illinois legislature. No one can criticize him if things go wrong. Why should he implicate himself in issues that may become controversial when they don’t help him personally? Those issues are unworthy by their very nature because they are not about him.

Obama’s election as the first black president of the Harvard Law Review led to a contract and an advance to write a book about race relations.  The University of Chicago Law  School provided him with a fellowship and an office to work on his book. The book took him a lot longer than expected and at the end it devolved into… guess what? His own autobiography! Instead of writing a scholarly paper  focusing on race relations, for which he had been paid, Obama could not resist writing about his most sublime self.  He entitled the book “Dreams from My  Father.”

Not surprisingly, Adolph Hitler also wrote his own autobiography when he was still nobody. So did Stalin. For a narcissist no subject is as important as his own self. Why would he waste his precious time and genius writing about insignificant things when he can write about such an august being as himself? Narcissists are often callous and even ruthless. As the norm, they lack conscience. This is evident from Obama’s lack of interest in his own brother who lives on only one  dollar per month. A man who lives in luxury, who takes a private jet to vacation in Hawaii, and who has raised nearly a half billion dollars for his campaign (something unprecedented in history) has no interest in the plight of his own brother. Why? His brother cannot be used for his ascent to power.  A narcissist cares for no one but himself. 

This election is like no other election in the history of America. The issues are insignificant compared to what is at stake. What can be more dangerous than having a man bereft of a conscience, a serial liar, and one who cannot distinguish his fantasies from reality as the leader of the free world?

I hate to sound alarmist, but one must be a fool if one is not  alarmed. Many politicians are narcissists. They pose no threat to others. They are simply self-serving and selfish. [Witness Al Gore's Income Tax; it reveals that he gave away NO MONEY to charities, not even to a church!] Obama evinces symptoms of pathological narcissism, which is different from the run-of-the-mill narcissism of a Richard Nixon or Bill  Clinton, for example. To him reality and fantasy are  intertwined. This is a mental health issue, not just a character flaw. Pathological narcissists are dangerous because they look normal and even intelligent. It is this  disguise that makes them treacherous. [Look up the word  'treachery.']

Today the Democrats have placed all their hopes in Obama. But this man could put an end to their party [and to this great  nation]. The great majority of blacks have also decided to  vote for Obama. Only a fool does not know that their support  for him is racially  driven.

Let  us call a spade a spade [No pun intended]. This is racism, pure and simple. The truth is that, while everyone carries a misconceived collective guilt towards blacks for wrongs done centuries ago by a bygone people to a bygone people, the  blacks carry a collective rancor, enmity or vendetta towards non-blacks, and to this day want to “stand up” to the white  man. They seem to be stuck in 19th century [encouraged by race baiters like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and others].

The  downside of this is, that if Obama turns out to be the disaster I predict, he will cause widespread resentment among the whites. The blacks are unlikely to give up their support of their man. Cultic mentality is pernicious and unrelenting. They will dig their heads deeper in the sand and blame Obama’s detractors of racism. This will cause a backlash among the whites. The white supremacists will take advantage of the discontent and they will receive widespread support. I predict that in less than four years, racial tensions will increase to levels not seen since the turbulent 1960s. Obama will set the clock back  decades.

America is the bastion of freedom. The peace of the world depends on the strength of America, and its weakness translates into the triumph of terrorism and victory of rogue nations. It is no wonder that Ahmadinejad, Hugo Chavez, the Maoist Castroists, the Hezbollah, the Hamas, the lawyers of the Guantanamo terrorists, and virtually all sworn enemies of America are so thrilled by the prospect of “their man” in the White  House. America is on the verge of destruction.  There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological  narcissist as president.

     Ali Sina

Comments Off


Obama’s Personality Pendulum
October 30, 2008, 9:19 am
Filed under: US Politics, Who Is Obama?
Chuck Norris
Obama’s Personality Pendulum
Obama will not lose his bid for the presidency because of his connections to Ayers, ACORN or socialist politics. In fact, he won’t lose it because of his stand on any issue. The coup de grace for Obama’s presidential election downfall will come only through convincing the American public of his lack of decisive leadership under pressure. I’m not just talking about facing rogue nations or terrorist thugs. I’m referring to making major choices in conflict. Indecisiveness is his greatest weakness, and it’s one this country cannot afford at this time in its history.

Interestingly, a while back, the Unit for the Study of Personality in Politics, at St. John’s University and the College of St. Benedict, did a professional personality profile “for anticipating Obama’s likely leadership style as chief executive, thereby providing a basis for inferring the character and tenor of a prospective Obama presidency.” The study concluded:

“The combination of Ambitious, Accommodating, and Outgoing patterns in Obama’s profile suggests a confident conciliator personality composite. Leaders with this personality prototype, though self-assured and ambitious, are characteristically gracious, considerate, and benevolent. They are energetic, charming, and agreeable, with a special knack for settling differences, favoring mediation and compromise over force or coercion as a strategy for resolving conflict. They are driven primarily by a need for achievement and also have strong affiliation needs, but a low need for power.”

While most might laud Obama’s personality as a needed polar opposite to George W. Bush’s, I pose to you that Obama’s “accommodating-conciliator-favoring-compromise” personality pendulum swing is way too far to the other side. Even Obama’s voting record proves that. His own Democratic colleagues have a difficult time understanding why, when he was an Illinois state senator, he voted “present”  (instead of “yes” or “no”) 129 times, including a number of noncommittal tallies on issues such as gun rights and abortion.

You also have heard that Obama doesn’t have any executive experience, whether it be running a government or a business. I would pose to you the reason is simply that he’s not comfortable making executive decisions. An “executive conciliator” overly depends upon others, at times compromising judgment and needed action in order to appease the masses. Proof of that was seen in how Obama handled his and our “emergency” economic decisions.

A few months ago, Obama did not turn to Warren Buffett for counsel on the housing crisis. As The Washington Post reported July 16, he turned to Franklin Raines, the former Fannie Mae chief executive officer and six-year money manipulator. The Post said Raines took “calls from Barack Obama’s presidential campaign seeking his advice on mortgage and housing policy matters.”

And consider Obama’s handling of the “emergency” bailout crisis. During the first go-round of the bailout, while McCain was certain of his stand, Obama wouldn’t say where he stood because he was afraid it would be a wrong or unpopular stand. Only after most of his political cronies were bribed in favor of the bailout did Obama give it his stamp of approval. If he cannot take decisive action as a senator in the greatest nation on earth, how in the world is he going to make critical and emergency decisions as the president?

Obama’s inability to draw and hold hard lines is the primary reason he repeatedly struggles with — and caves and morphs into — the polls or people in front of him. More than any other politician in history, he has flip-flopped on a host of critical issues: Iraq, Iran, gay rights, NAFTA, abortion, race, religion, gun control, etc. It’s one thing to be political, but it’s quite another to be a chronic people pleaser under pressure. Swaying based on political expediency is not a leadership quality we need in tough times. Sooner or later, that character flaw will bite Obama big-time — and us if we elect him president.

I’m not saying Obama has no continued future in politics. He just needs more experience in life to weed out those character deficiencies. That’s why I’m asking Americans to look afresh at these questions: Is Obama crisis-leadership qualified? Will he truly be ready Jan. 20 to assume the helm of our country?

Actually, those leadership questions have been answered already by three leading Democrats (before they could taste the perks from their alignment with the Democratic presidential nominee). Obama’s own running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, replied only months ago about whether Obama is ready for the presidency: “Right now I don’t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.” Then he later told George Stephanopoulos, “I stand by the statement.” Biden was right.

Before Obama was her party’s choice, Hillary Clinton repeatedly proved him to be an indecisive waffler who couldn’t or wouldn’t be pinned down on any issues. Hillary was right.

Even former President Bill Clinton dodged having to give an affirmative answer to an ABC correspondent when asked whether Obama is ready to be president by saying, “You can argue that no one is ready to be president.” Another smooth answer, Bill. The fact is he totally understands that Obama is not ready.

America is in one of its toughest hours — a market meltdown, the worst fiscal environment since the Great Depression — an economic 9/11, if you will. Do we really believe we can be delivered by an indecisive people pleaser as our country’s CEO?

Comments Off


Democrats’ Criticism of Rich is Uncharitable
October 29, 2008, 7:08 pm
Filed under: The Left, US Politics

So, what do “the rich” pay in federal income taxes?  Nothing, right?  That, at least, is what most people think.  And Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama wants to raise the top marginal rate for “the rich” — known in some quarters as “job creators.”

A recent poll commissioned by Investor’s Business Daily asked, in effect, “What share do you think the rich pay?”  Their findings?  Most people are completely clueless about the amount the rich actually do pay.

First, the data.  The top 5 percent (those making more than $153,542 — the group whose taxes Obama seeks to raise) pay 60 percent of all federal income taxes.  The rich (aka the top 1 percent of income earners, those making more than $388,806 a year), according to the Internal Revenue Service, pay 40 percent of all federal income taxes.  The top 1 percent’s taxes comprise 17 percent of the federal government’s revenue from all sources, including corporate taxes, excise taxes, social insurance, and retirement receipts.

Now, what do people think the rich pay?  The IBD/TIPP poll found that 36 percent of those polled thought the rich contribute 10 percent or less of all federal income taxes.  Another 15 percent thought the rich pay between 10 percent and 20 percent, while another 10 percent thought the rich’s share is between 20 percent and 30 percent.  In other words, most people thought the rich pay less — far less — than they actually do.  Only 12 percent of those polled thought the rich pay more than 40 percent.

Let’s try this another way.  A U.S. News & World Report blogger went to the Democratic National Convention in Denver and conducted an informal poll of 24 DNC delegates.  He asked them, “What should “the rich” pay in income taxes?”  Half the respondents said “25 percent”; 25 percent said “20 percent”; 12 percent said “30 percent”; and another 12 percent said, “35 percent”.  The average DNC delegate wanted the rich to pay 25.6 percent, which is lower than what the rich pay now — both by share of taxes and by tax rate!

Thirty percent of American voters pay nothing — zero, zip, nada — in federal income taxes.  And, not too surprisingly, compared with tax-paying voters, they are more likely to support spending that benefits them.  The majority of the 30 percent who don’t pay federal income taxes agree with Obama’s $65 billion plan to institute taxpayer-funded universal health coverage.  But the majority of the 70 percent who pay federal income taxes are opposed to Obama’s health care plan.

Non-taxpayers support Obama’s plans for increased tax deductions for lower-income Americans, along with higher overall tax rates levied against middle- and upper-income households.  The majority of non-taxpayers (57 percent)also favor raising the individual income-tax rate for those in the highest bracket from 35 percent to 54 percent.  And the majority (59 percent) favors raising Social Security taxes by 4 percent for any individual or business that makes at least $250,000.

Obama calls increasing taxes and giving them to the needy a matter of “neighborliness.”  Vice presidential running mate Joe Biden calls it a matter of “patriotism.” 

Yet when it comes to charitable giving, neither Obama (until recently) nor Biden feels sufficiently neighborly or patriotic to donate as much as does the average American household:  2 percent of their adjusted gross income.

Liberal families earn about 6 percent more than conservative families, yet conservative households donate about 30 percent more to charity than do liberal households.  And conservatives give more than just to their own churches and other houses of worship.  Conservatives, especially religious conservatives, give far more money and donate more of their time to nonreligious charitable causes than do liberals — especially secular liberals.

In 2007, President Bush and his wife had an adjusted gross income of $923,807.  They paid $221,635 in taxes, and donated $165,660 to charity — or 18 percent of their income.

Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, earned between $200,000 and $300,00 a year between 2000 and 2004, and they donated less than 1 percent to charity.  When their income soared to $4.2 million in 2007, their charitable contributions went up to 5 percent.

Joe and Jill Biden, by contrast, made $319,853 and gave $995 to charity in 2007, or 0.3 percent of their income.  And that was during the year Biden was running for president.  Over the past 10 years, the Bidens earned $2,450,042 and gave $3,690 to charity — or 0.1 percent of their income.

So let’s sum up.  The “compassionate” liberals — at least based on charitable giving — show less compassion that “hardhearted” conservatives.  The rich pay more in income taxes than people think.  Voters, clueless about the facts, want the rich to pay still more.

    Larry Elder, attorney, syndicated columnist, and talk show host

Comments Off


Presidential Poll Among the Military (sent by Bob Luttrell)
October 29, 2008, 6:24 pm
Filed under: US Politics

   Interesting Poll from our guys and gals serving:  In case you  missed this week’s issue of the Army Times here are the results of the Army Times’  poll of Military personnel on the election (in  percent):  Sadly, many of their votes will not be counted!!!!

                              
McCain%        Obama%

  
 Overall                     68                 23
  Army                         68                 23
  Navy                          69                 24
   Air Force                  67                 24
   Marines                    75                 18

  Retirees                     72                 20

  White Non-Hispanic   76                 17
  Hispanic                     63                 27
  Black/African-American 12             79

  Enlisted                         67              24

  Officers                         70              22

   Somehow I missed seeing this in the New York Times or on CBS/NBC/ABC/CNN!

Comments Off


“In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe?” (sent by Dick Higbie)
October 29, 2008, 6:16 pm
Filed under: The Islamic Conspiracy, US Politics

Here is the speech of Geert Wilders, chairman Party for Freedom, the Netherlands, at the Four Seasons, New York, introducing an Alliance of Patriots and announcing the Facing Jihad Conference in Jerusalem. The speech was sponsored by the Hudson Institute on September 25, 2008.

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me. Great to be at the Four Seasons. I come from a country that has one season only: a rainy season that starts January 1st and ends December 31st. When we have three sunny days in a row, the government declares a national emergency. So Four Seasons, that’s new  to me.

It’s great to be in New York. When I see the skyscrapers and office buildings, I think of what Ayn Rand said: “The sky over New York and the will of man made visible.” Of course. Without the Dutch you would have been nowhere, still figuring out how to buy this island from the Indians.  But we are glad we did it for you. And, frankly, you did a far better job than we possibly could have done.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe. This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West.

The danger I see looming is the scenario of America as the last man standing. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe. In a generation or two, the US will ask itself: who lost Europe? Patriots from around Europe risk their lives every day to prevent precisely this scenario from becoming a reality.

My short lecture consists of 4 parts. First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe. Then, I will say a few things about Islam. Thirdly, if you are still here, I will talk a little bit about the movie you just saw. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem.

The Europe you know is changing. You have probably seen the landmarks. The Eiffel Tower and Trafalgar Square and Rome’s ancient buildings and  maybe the canals of Amsterdam. They are still there. And they still look very  much the same as they did a hundred years ago. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world, a world very few visitors see – and one that does not appear in your tourist guidebook. It is the world of the parallel society created by Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout  Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighbourhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It’s the world of head scarves, where  women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity.

These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighbourhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe.  These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe, street by street, neighbourhood by neighbourhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe. With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam, Marseille and Malmo in Sweden. In many cities the majority of the under-18
population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighbourhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.  In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims. Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.

In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear “whore, whore”. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in their country of origin. In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin.

The history of the Holocaust can in many cases no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity. In  England sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighbourhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head  scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels.., because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run from the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel.

I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe. San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century. Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France. One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks.

The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favour of a worldwide caliphate. A Dutch study reported that half of Dutch Muslims admit they “understand” the 9/11 attacks. Muslims demand what they call ‘respect’. And this is how we give them respect. Our elites are willing to give in. To give up. In my own country we have gone from calls by one cabinet member to turn Muslim holidays into official state holidays, to statements by another cabinet member, that Islam is part of Dutch culture, to an affirmation by the Christian-Democratic attorney general that he is willing to accept sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey.

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behaviour, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. Some prefer to see these as isolated incidents, but I call it a Muslim intifada. I call the perpetrators “settlers”. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively  against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighbourhoods, their cities, their countries. Politicians shy away from taking a stand against this creeping sharia. They believe in the equality of all cultures. Moreover, on a mundane level, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

Our many problems with Islam cannot be explained by poverty, repression or the European colonial past, as the Left claims. Nor does it have anything to do with Palestinians or American troops in Iraq. The problem is Islam itself.

Allow me to give you a brief Islam 101. The first thing you need to  know about Islam is the importance of the book of the Quran. The Quran is Allah’s personal word, revealed by an angel to Mohammed, the prophet. This is where the trouble starts. Every word in the Quran is Allah’s word and therefore not open to discussion or interpretation. It is valid for every Muslim and for all times. Therefore, there is no such a thing as moderate Islam.

Sure, there are a lot of moderate Muslims. But a moderate Islam is non-existent. The Quran calls for hatred, violence, submission, murder, and  terrorism.  The Quran calls for Muslims to kill non-Muslims, to terrorize non-Muslims and to fulfil their duty to wage war: violent jihad. Jihad is a duty for every Muslim, Islam is to rule the world – by the sword. The Quran is clearly anti-Semitic, describing Jews as monkeys and pigs.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behaviour is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages – at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. He advised on matters of slavery, but never advised to liberate slaves. Islam has no other morality than the advancement of Islam. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad. There is no gray area or other side.

Quran as Allah’s own word and Mohammed as the perfect man are the two most important facets of Islam. Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion.  Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means ’submission’. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.  This is what you need to know about Islam, in order to understand what is going on in Europe. For millions of Muslims the Quran and the life of Mohammed are not 14 centuries old, but are an everyday reality, an ideal that guides every aspect of their lives.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam “the most retrograde force in the world”, and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. Which brings me to my movie, Fitna.

I am a lawmaker, and not a movie maker. But I felt I had the moral duty to educate about Islam. The duty to make clear that the Quran stands at the heart of what some people call terrorism but is in reality jihad. I wanted to show that the problems of Islam are at the core of Islam, and do not belong to its fringes.  Now, from the day the plan for my movie was made public, it caused  quite a stir, in the Netherlands and throughout Europe. First, there was a political storm, with government leaders, across the continent in sheer panic.  The Netherlands was put under a heightened terror alert, because of  possible attacks or a revolt by our Muslim population. The Dutch branch of the Islamic organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir declared that the Netherlands was due for an attack. Internationally, there was a series of incidents. The Taliban threatened to organize additional attacks against Dutch troops in Afghanistan, and a website linked to Al Qaeda published the message  that I ought to be killed, while various muftis in the Middle East stated that I would be responsible for all the bloodshed after the screening of the movie.

In Afghanistan and Pakistan the Dutch flag was burned on several occasions. Dolls representing me were also burned. The Indonesian President announced that I will never be admitted into Indonesia again, while the UN Secretary General and the European Union issued cowardly statements in the same vein as those made by the Dutch Government. I could go on and on. It was an absolute disgrace, a sell-out.

A plethora of legal troubles also followed, and have not ended yet. Currently the state of Jordan is litigating against me. Only last week there were renewed security agency reports about a heightened terror alert  for the Netherlands because of Fitna.

Now, I would like to say a few things about Israel. Because, very soon, we will get together in its capital. The best way for a politician in Europe to lose votes is to say something positive about Israel. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I, however, will continue to speak up for Israel. I see defending Israel as a matter of principle. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel. First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

Samuel Huntington writes it so aptly: “Islam has bloody borders”.  Israel is located precisely on that border. This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam’s territorial advance. Israel is  facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia. Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War. The war against Israel is not a war against Israel. It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel, Islamic imperialism  would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest.

Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming. Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West. It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel, they can get everything. Therefore, it is not that the West has a stake in Israel. It is Israel.

It is very difficult to be an optimist in the face of the growing Islamization of Europe. All the tides are against us. On all fronts we are losing. Demographically the momentum is with Islam. Muslim immigration is even a source of pride within ruling liberal parties. Academia, the arts, the media, trade unions, the churches, the business world, the entire political establishment have all converted to the suicidal theory of multiculturalism. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a ‘right-wing extremists’ or ‘racists’. The entire establishment has sided with our enemy. Leftists, liberals and Christian-Democrats are now all in bed with Islam. This is the most painful thing to see: the betrayal by our elites. At this moment in Europe’s history, our elites are supposed to lead us. To  stand up for centuries of civilization. To defend our heritage. To honour our eternal Judeo-Christian values that made Europe what it is today. But there are very few signs of hope to be seen at the governmental level.

Sarkozy,  Merkel, Brown, Berlusconi; in private, they probably know how grave the situation is. But when the little red light goes on, they stare into the camera and tell us that Islam is a religion of peace, and we should all try to get along nicely and sing Kumbaya. They willingly participate in what President Reagan so aptly called: “the betrayal of our past, the squandering of our freedom.”

If there is hope in Europe, it comes from the people, not from the elites. Change can only come from a grass-roots level. It has to come from the citizens themselves. Yet these patriots will have to take on the entire political, legal and media establishment. Over the past years there have been some small, but encouraging, signs of a rebirth of the original European spirit. Maybe the elites turn their backs on freedom, the public does not. In my country, the Netherlands, 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the  number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat to our national identity. I don’t think the public opinion in Holland is very different from other European countries.

Patriotic parties that oppose jihad are growing, against all odds. My own party debuted two years ago, with five percent of the vote. Now it stands at ten percent in the polls. The same is true of all similarly-minded parties in Europe. They are fighting the liberal establishment, and are gaining footholds on the political arena, one voter at the time. Now, for the first time, these patriotic parties will come together and exchange experiences. It may be the start of something big. Something that might change the map of Europe for decades to come. It might also be Europe’s last chance.

This December a conference will take place in Jerusalem. Thanks to Professor Aryeh Eldad, a member of the Knesset, we will be able to watch Fitna in the Knesset building and discuss the jihad. We are organizing this event in Israel to emphasize the fact that we are all in the same boat together, and that Israel is part of our common heritage. Those attending will be a select audience. No racist organizations will be allowed. And we will only admit parties that are solidly democratic.

This conference will be the start of an Alliance of European patriots. This Alliance will serve as the backbone for all organizations and political parties that oppose jihad and Islamization. For this Alliance I seek your support. This endeavor may be crucial to America and to the West. America may hold fast to the dream that, thanks to its location, it is safe from jihad and shaira. But seven years ago to the day, there was still smoke rising from ground zero, following the attacks that forever shattered that dream. Yet there is a danger, an even greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America – as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome, Athens and Jerusalem.

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation  never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and  whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe’s children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do  so. This is not the first time our civilization is under threat. We have seen dangers before. We have been betrayed by our elites before. They have sided with our enemies before. And yet, then, freedom prevailed. These are not times in which to take lessons from appeasement, capitulation, giving away, giving up or giving in. These are not times in which to draw lessons from Mr. Chamberlain. These are times calling us to draw  lessons from Mr. Churchill and the words he spoke in 1942: “Never give in, never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy”.

     Geert Wilders

Comments Off


One Hundred Reasons Why I Will Not Vote For Barak Obama (sent by Dale Alvarez)
October 29, 2008, 5:57 pm
Filed under: The Left, US Politics, Who Is Obama?

Every recent presidential election has been consequential because America remains at a cross roads: Will we choose Judeo-Christian cultural values that bless our nation, or will we turn down the road to secularism which will weaken and destroy us?  

I will enumerate how the election of Barak Obama as president of the US would be a disastrous wrong turn. My view takes into account Senator Obama’s charisma and oratorical skills and the historic nature of his run as our first black nominee. On the surface, it’s easy to “like” Barak Obama and be attracted to “change.” But there are at least one hundred reasons why I will not vote for him.

Let’s examine these reasons through the two-fold prism of 1) Character-including experience, competence, judgment and associations, and 2) Policies-which include economics, foreign affairs, and moral/social issues.

Personal Character: Who IS Barak Obama? He appears to be:

1. An ambitious politician – unwilling to take the time and patience to build a national reputation as an experienced leader (eighteen months in the US Senate?).

2. Unusually double-tongued – he has taken multiple positions on many issues.  

3. Possibly dishonest – he lied about his tolerance of Rev. Wright’s message and his position on infanticide in the Illinois legislature.

4. At times arrogant – his comments about gun owners and people of faith (San Fran. fund-raiser).

5. Sometimes elitist and unconcerned – refusal to see our troops on his European tour.

6. Naively accepting of the liberal theology taught at Trinity Church (it’s a quasi-communist perversion of Christianity i.e. the Nicaraguan Sandinistas).

7. Not forthright in his biography about his father and family background.

8. Not willing to admit errors – (did the surge work in Iraq?)

9. He sometimes gives deceptive (nuanced) answers on questions (Saddleback Forum) to hide his true beliefs. Experience/Competence:

10. He has an incredibly thin resume (shortest in history)

11. Lack of accomplishments (only community organizing and winning elections?). 

 12. He has authored no major piece of legislation.

13. He is the number one liberal (secularist) in the United States Senate (his voting record).

14. He would naively talk to dictators (Castro, Kim Jong-il, Ahmadinejad etc.)

15. He has little foreign policy experience in a dangerous global environment.

16. He has no real-world experience (never run a business, done a pay roll etc.).

17. He regularly makes poor judgment calls on international affairs.

18. He is plainly partisan-he has never “crossed the aisle” on any Senate votes.

19. He has never built non-partisan coalitions (like John McCain has done).

20. He appears at times to be hesitant and confused – without his teleprompter. Questionable Associations (bad judgment about friends)

21. Rev. Jeremiah Wright (how could he tolerate his bigotry for 20 years?).

22. Father Phleger, the similarly-racist Catholic priest friend in Chicago.

23. William Ayers – the unrepentant terrorist with whom he is “friendly.”

24. Tony Rezko – the convicted felon to whom he funneled 14 million tax dollars.

25. Louis Farrakhan – Obama attended and supported the Million Man March.

26. Trinity Church – (even Oprah had the judgment to leave this radical church).

27. College studies – at Harvard & Columbia he enjoyed radical authors & thinkers.

28. Wife-Michelle – she thinks America is “mean,” and this is the first time she’s been “proud of her country.”

29. Had to fire his dishonest lobbyist staffer-then continued to criticize John McCain on lobbyists.

30. Joe Biden – he’s a condemned-plagiarizer who is the number three liberal in the Senate. (votes) Character comes first in choosing our leaders, but policy issues or worldview is the other category that will shape their decision-making. Let’s look at what Obama will DO if elected to the highest office in the land:

Social Issues

31. He’s a strong pro-abortionist-one million babies would continue to die each year.

32. He is for homosexual civil unions, which is a “nuanced” way of being for same-sex marriage-something that will destroy the family institution in our nation.

33. He would repeal the DOMA laws (he’s no Federalist).

34. He is for fetal stem cell research (this is a cover for abortion which denies the reality that adult or blood cord stem cells are far superior).

35. He would not stand against human cloning.

36. In economics, Obama leans toward socialism (which is why calls himself a “Citizen of the World.”)

37. His worldview is really quasi-Marxist-including major redistribution of wealth.

38. He is pro-universal health care which would hurt the best medical system in the world.

39. He is anti-school choice – the one thing that would rescue American education.

40. He is anti-vouchers (ditto above, while sending his own kids to private schools).

41. He would restore the Fairness Doctrine to silence talk radio (he doesn’t like dissent).

42. He’s against voluntary prayer in the schools.

43. Obama’s worldview is really secular-in opposition to our Christian heritage.

44. He voted to approve infanticide in the Illinois legislature-then lied about it..

45. He’s pro sex-ed and anti-abstinence education (multiplying confusion and venereal disease).

46. Obama is honestly anti- 2nd Amendment – he just supports guns sometimes when it’s expedient.

Judicial Issues

47. Obama would appoint activist judges to the US Supreme Court.

48. He would nominate “legislate from the bench” appellate court judges.

49. He would confirm activist US attorneys.

50. He would veto all necessary TORT reform legislation.

51. He believes in a “living Constitution”-which means he doesn’t believe in anything absolute.

Economic Issues

52. He will increase the capital gains tax-discouraging investment.

53. He will restore the “death tax” – robbing families of their inheritance.

54. He will not renew the Bush tax cuts – thus raising taxes on ALL paying Americans.

55. He will increase the dividends tax (hurting further the volatile Stock Market).

56. Obama is against the Fair Tax – which would do away with the burdensome IRS.

57. He is against a flat tax – another tax “change” that would help the economy.

58. He would increase government spending by possibly one trillion dollars in four years.

59. His Income taxes increases would penalize the productive (up to 35%-47%).

60. He would create larger bureaucratic entitlement programs (such as health care).

61. He supports wasteful and scandalous Congressional “earmarks.”

62. His administration would greatly advance the nanny state mentality in the US.

63. His “Wind Fall Profits tax” would raise the price of gas (remember Jimmy Carter?).

64. He would increase government regulations on many industries (especially energy).

65. He is anti-free trade (NAFTA), or is he? (Maybe we should ask Canadians).

66. He will not allow any privatization of Social Security, continuing to bankrupt and doom the program.

67. His health care plan  would not lower the premiums of current payers (his claim).

68. He would not enforce the borders of this country (anti-fence).

69. He has no substantial immigration plan, which hurts the country economically.

70. He supports sanctuary cities where crime is rising.

71. He supports health care for illegals (which is crushing the health care system in some states).

72. He is against drilling for more oil in the lower 48 states (keeping gas prices high).

73. He is against drilling in ANWAR (keeping gas prices high).

74. He is against nuclear power (keeping electrical prices high).

75. He is against clean coal energy (which will keep electrical prices high).

76. He is for forcing industry to use economically non-viable renewable fuels (ditto).

77. He is for greater central management of the economy.

78. He wants to further tax the wealthy in this country that already pay 97% of the tax load.

79. He isn’t committed to sound monetary policy (a gold peg or standard).

80. He’s too beholden to the unions (which are shrinking in America.)

81. He believes in the radical environmental agenda and the unproven theory of man-made global warming (or is it cooling, or the safe term “climate change?”).

Foreign Policy

82. Obama would cut “ten of billions of dollars” from the military budget.

83. He chose to play basketball in Europe rather than visit troops because he saw no political advantage to the visit.

84. He hadn’t visited Iraq for two years-prior to his recent Middle East tour.

85. He is committed to retreat-and-surrender in Iraq (arbitrary 16-month timetable).

86. He doesn’t understand the evil intent of radical Islam.

87. He would conduct singly party negotiations with Iran (against many precedents).

88. He would support single party negotiations with the North Korean dictator.

89. His “policing” terrorism policies would embolden Al Qaeda and other terrorist cells.

90. He shares the European “appeasement” approach to terrorism.

91. The terrorists prefer Obama to John McCain (story on Al Jazeera). That tells you everything.

92. He is weak on Iran, which is close to producing atom weaponry.

93. He would close the Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) terrorist prison.

94. He would stop strong interrogations of suspected terrorists (risking American lives).

95. He would weaken the surveillance capabilities of Homeland Security.

96. He would down-size the American military during a time of war.

97. He would not listen to the generals on the ground (his unilateral timetable)

98. He would lean more on the United Nations for easing global tensions (the UN?).

99. He would give up land for peace in the Mid-East (emboldening Israel’s hostile neighbors).

100. He is naïve about evil (The Saddleback Civil Forum).

Want more? Barak Obama has incredible style-but he is woefully lacking in moral and principled substance. He reminds me of another great orator who rose to prominence seventy years ago while running a campaign of “change.” His name was Adolph Hitler. Obama is not Hitler – but his policies would hurt America – and I love this nation enough to not vote for him to be president of the United States.

     Ron Boehme

Comments Off


What Would JFK Say About Obama?
October 29, 2008, 10:57 am
Filed under: US Politics

Listen to JFK, as he asks and answers four questions…  Now, how does the Obama – Biden ticket measure up to this Democrat icon?

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnC5NydJniU&feature=related

Comments Off


Democrats on an Escalator (sent by Dutch van Luyn)
October 29, 2008, 10:54 am
Filed under: Humor (If one can laugh at such a serious situation), The Left

If this weren’t close to the truth it would REALLY be hilarious… but it’s darned funny anyway!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4XgKGUGKJo

Comments Off


Wizard of Washington (sent by Bill Hardy)
October 29, 2008, 10:50 am
Filed under: Humor (If one can laugh at such a serious situation), US Politics

This is a hilarious parody on the Wizard of Oz, starring the candidates in the 2008 Presidential election:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wLI5uj7KQc

Comments Off


Notice to All Employees (sent by Betsy Woodruff)
October 29, 2008, 12:27 am
Filed under: Humor (If one can laugh at such a serious situation)

As of November 5, 2008, when President Obama is officially elected into office, our company will instill a few new policies which are in keeping with his new, inspiring issues of change and fairness:

1.     All salespeople will be pooling their sales and bonuses into a common pool that will be divided equally between all of you.  This will serve to give those of you who are under-achieving a “fair shake”.

2.     All low level workers will be pooling their wages, including overtime, into a common pool, dividing it equally amongst you.  This will help those who are “too busy for overtime” to reap the rewards from those who have more spare time and can work extra hours.

3.     All top management will now be referred to as “the government.” We will not participate in this “pooling” experience because the law doesn’t apply to us.

4.     The “government” will give eloquent speeches to all employees every week, encouraging its workers to continue to work hard “for the good of all”.

5.     The employees will be thrilled with these new policies because it’s “good to spread the wealth around”.  Those of you who have underachieved will finally get an opportunity; those of you who have worked hard and had success will feel more “patriotic”.

6.  The last few people who were hired should clean out their desks.  Don’t feel bad, though, because President Obama will give you free healthcare, free handouts, free oil for heating your home, free food stamps, and he’ll let you stay in your home for as long as you want even if you can’t pay your mortgage.  If you appeal directly to our democratic congress, you might even get a free flat screen TV and a coupon for free haircuts (shouldn’t all Americans be entitled to nice looking hair?)!!!

If for any reason you are not happy with the new policies, you may want to rethink your vote on November 4th.

Comments Off


Straight talk for Republicans and Democrats (sent by Bob Luttrell)
October 29, 2008, 12:25 am
Filed under: US Politics, Who Is Obama?

Most Americans are aware of Bill Lear, because of his Lear Jet business; however,  he has accomplished much more, as you can see at this link:    William P. Lear — Britannica Online Encyclopedia .  His opinions are worth a read:

 A Humble Plea to McCain and Obama Supporters:
 
Dear friends,
 
I am truly astonished by the ignorance Obama supporters have displayed in their quest to get someone – ANYONE – into the White House. Now, wait a minute. I can well understand your dislike or even hatred of our clown, GWB, but he is not the root cause of all of our problems. Our Congress is. And a change there would be welcomed by all. You ain’t gonna get it done with Obama. You gotta fire the whole damnable crooked Congress. (Read my book, ‘BERNIE’S WAR!’).
 
Perhaps I’m looking at all of this from a different perspective than you because my life experiences have been so different from yours. I’m 80-years old and have traveled the world where I’ve seen a great deal.   I spent five years on active duty as a fighter pilot in the USAF and another seven years flying with the Air National Guard in California and Texas as well as a few years flying in the USAF Reserve. I spent three years on active duty in Germany flying Czech border patrol with ‘cold guns’ in aircraft inferior to the MIG during the Korean ‘Police Action’ when it was thought that Korea was a diversion for a Soviet invasion of Western Europe.
 
I lived abroad for a total of 28 years. Three years in Germany, twenty years in Switzerland and five years in Great Britain where I was based doing ’spook’ work for the U.S. behind the Iron Curtain before it fell.  During that era of the Cold War I ventured to Moscow, Prague, Warsaw, Bucharest, Peshawar, Pakistan and Bulgaria posing as a Swiss French-speaking arms dealer purchasing weapons we surreptitiously supplied to the Afghani Mujahedeen in their successful fight against the Soviets all of which came back to haunt us.  I’ve been there and done that and have had close associations with top government people in Germany, the Netherlands and Great Britain. I’ve had more foreign affair experience than Obama could ever dream of and, yet,  wouldn’t have the temerity to deign myself ‘Presidential’ material; although I feel eminently more qualified to judge who would NOT be best for our country. My long-time world experience should count for something in my plea to you to abandon this miscreant flake. You will only be doing yourself and our country an enormous disservice if you persist in your support of this flash-in-the-pan opportunist. On this, you MUST trust me.
 
I’ve associated closely with European royalty and African politicians.  I’ve traveled to the Far East to observe their cultures. My point is that Obama, although formally well educated and a brilliant orator, is a neophyte when it comes to understanding the world and is uniquely unqualified for the job as President of these great United States. His knowledge of economics is nil and his tax proposals absurd and life-threatening to the U.S. not only in economic terms but in preserving our national security as well. I don’t want a ‘citizen of the world’ to be President, I want a citizen of the good old USA to be President.  Screw the rest of the world as they have well and truly screwed us. The time has come for us to awaken and start looking after ourselves. Now THAT would be CHANGE if that’s what you’re looking for.
 
While McCain has abstained from playing ‘the race-card’, Obama  is playing it to the hilt even though he’s technically not an African-American.  To qualify for this distinction you must be at least one-sixth black.  Obama is only one-eighth. His father would be, as he was one-sixth. No, Obama is more Muslim than black yet he trades on his blackness.
 
The larger question I have about him is that we really don’t know much about him other than what HE  tells us, what we read on blogs and from some serious non-partisan investigators whose factual reports are, unfortunately, generally ignored and which receive precious little media exposure.
 
I, as a registered Independent, a military veteran and a patriot, beseech you to put aside party considerations and vote for the lesser of the two evils. Yes, I am NOT a McCain supporter, but he is, at least, not a flake, doesn’t carry Muslim baggage and is a PROVEN hero and patriot WITH experience. It’s not a party issue. It’s all about electing the best we can trust with what we’ve got to work with. Mr. Obama is NOT that guy.
 
Please, please rethink your voting position.

Thanks for reading my innermost thoughts. I care about all of you, but
I care more about our country. Please help me to do both.
 
William P. (Bill) Lear, Jr.    
lear@cfl.rr.com

Comments Off


A Banker Looks at our Current Financial Mess (sent by Bob Luttrell)
October 28, 2008, 11:41 pm
Filed under: The Left, US Politics

Most of my friends know, I have tried to stop thinking, but I can’t help it in the wake of all the recent economic news.

My banking career started in 1970 and ended in 1993, but I still keep close ties to the industry. During my banking years I did learn one or two things along the way. The problem with our economy today is from a liberal thinking congress, senators, and presidents, as well as greed and dishonesty. When you put these together it spells disaster in any area of our life.

Ask any banker (just walk in and ask one that has been there for 15 or 20 years) and they will tell you these are the FACTS:

* Under Jimmy Carter, we received the Community Reinvestment act. This law says banks have to make loans in low income areas and it has forced many lending institutions to seek to make loans to people in areas that lenders would not normally go because of the risk and low property values. (Sub Prime Loans). This was in 1977. In 1980, President Carter and a Democratic controlled congress passed the Depositor y Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act– The law also removed the power of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors under the Glass-Steagall Act and Regulation to set the interest rates of savings accounts. A sad fact is we are all still feeling the effects of his policies and decisions 30 years later. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass-Steagall_Act <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_Q

* Then in 1995, President Bill Clinton made changes to the Community Reinvestment Act that forced an increase in the number of loans to these people and the aggregate dollar amounts loaned.– Larger loans to people with less income in areas where the collateral value would go down instead of up. (Clinton should have had his mind on the long range effects of this instead of Monica.) This was in response to pressure from “community organizers”. Can you think of a former Community Organizer running for president? Hint – he’s a Democrat.

* In 1999, Mr. Clinton signed to repeal the Glass-Steagall act which had protected taxpayers since the Great Depression.

* In 2003 President Bush tried to propose a change in regulatory control over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and place both companies under the control of the Department of the Treasury, but was voted down by the liberal democrats led by Barney Frank. Remember the name Barney Frank, he is one of Obama’s top two economic advisors; the other is Jim Johnson who was the head of Freddie Mac and walked away with $24,000,000.

* Now, Mr. Obama and his liberal cronies are spinning the facts so you will believe that all our financial problems are because of Bush’s failed economic policy. However, OBAMA’S two MOST TRUSTED ECONOMIC ADVISERS TO HIS CAMPAIGN are the very people that were in control of Freddie Mac- Jim Johnson $24,000,000 and Fannie Mae – Franklin Raines $90,000,000 in 6 years. In addition, since
1989 their have been several politicians who have received campaign donations and kick backs from these two failed institutions. The #1 recipient is Senator Chris Dodd-D RI and the runner up is none other than Senator Barrack Obama who received the second largest amount of donations (over $500,000) which is phenomenal because he has only been in the Senate for 3 years.

When Enron went belly up, we demanded Senate hearings and investigations. Why aren’t the Democrats demanding the same with these companies?

But, oh yeah, I forgot. It is Bush’s fault! Just ask a Banker. 

     Jerry Teasley, banker, and I approved this email

Comments Off


Wake Up America! You’re About to be a Socialist Country (sent by Don Huffman)
October 28, 2008, 11:37 pm
Filed under: The Left

This well-conceived “slide show” shows us the path that was taken to get us to this place in history… and our destiny… IF we don’t do something NOW!

     http://objllc.com/USSA.htm

Comments Off